Sustainable Chemistry Implementation Guide Section 6: Appendices

The following authoritative and regulatory lists may be used as resources to identify Walmart Priority Chemicals for reduction, restriction, or elimination in accordance with Walmart's Sustainable Chemistry in Consumables. These lists meet the criteria specified in Appendix 2 and have been selected by Walmart to contribute to the universe of Priority Chemicals tracked for reduction.


European Union

  • ECHA Investigation Report: Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers
  • ECHA Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity Assessment List
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications – Carcinogenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Germ Cell Mutagenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Reproductive Toxicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex II - Prohibited Substances
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex III - Other Limitations and Requirements (Fragrance Allergens)
  • EU Endocrine Disrupters – Ranked Priority List - Human Health Categorizations 1 and 2
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XIV - Substances Subject to Authorization
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XV - Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for Authorisation

International Agency for Research on Cancer

  • Groups 1 (Carcinogenic to Humans) and 2A (Probably Carcinogenic to Humans) and 2B (Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans)

U.N. Environment Program

  • Stockholm Convention Secretariat Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)

U.S. EPA

  • Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) PBT Chemicals
  • Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) – 2014 Work Plan Chemicals
  • Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) - Section 6 Chemicals Subject to Risk Evaluations

U.S. National Toxicology Program

  • Report on Carcinogens – Known to be Human Carcinogens and Reasonably Anticipated to be Human Carcinogens

U.S. State of California

  • Proposition 65 – Carcinogens/Developmental/Reproductive Toxicants
  • Safer Consumer Products - Informational List of Candidate Chemicals and Chemical Groups

U.S. State of Maine

  • Chemicals of High Concern
  • Priority Chemicals

U.S. State of Minnesota

  • Priority Chemicals

U.S. State of Washington

  • Chemicals of High Concern to Children (CHCC)
  • Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxins

European Union

International Agency for Research on Cancer

  • ECHA Investigation Report: Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers
  • ECHA Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity Assessment List
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications – Carcinogenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Germ Cell Mutagenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Reproductive Toxicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex II - Prohibited Substances
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex III - Other Limitations and Requirements (Fragrance Allergens)
  • EU Endocrine Disrupters – Ranked Priority List - Human Health Categorizations 1 and 2
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XIV - Substances Subject to Authorization
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XV - Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for Authorisation
  • Groups 1 (Carcinogenic to Humans) and 2A (Probably Carcinogenic to Humans) and 2B (Possibly Carcinogenic to Humans)

European Union

U.N. Environment Program

  • ECHA Investigation Report: Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers
  • ECHA Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity Assessment List
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications – Carcinogenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Germ Cell Mutagenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Reproductive Toxicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex II - Prohibited Substances
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex III - Other Limitations and Requirements (Fragrance Allergens)
  • EU Endocrine Disrupters – Ranked Priority List - Human Health Categorizations 1 and 2
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XIV - Substances Subject to Authorization
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XV - Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for Authorisation
  • Stockholm Convention Secretariat Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)

European Union

U.S. EPA

  • ECHA Investigation Report: Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers
  • ECHA Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity Assessment List
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications – Carcinogenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Germ Cell Mutagenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Reproductive Toxicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex II - Prohibited Substances
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex III - Other Limitations and Requirements (Fragrance Allergens)
  • EU Endocrine Disrupters – Ranked Priority List - Human Health Categorizations 1 and 2
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XIV - Substances Subject to Authorization
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XV - Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for Authorisation
  • Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) PBT Chemicals
  • Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) – 2014 Work Plan Chemicals
  • Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) - Section 6 Chemicals Subject to Risk Evaluations

European Union

U.S. National Toxicology Program

  • ECHA Investigation Report: Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers
  • ECHA Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity Assessment List
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications – Carcinogenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Germ Cell Mutagenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Reproductive Toxicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex II - Prohibited Substances
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex III - Other Limitations and Requirements (Fragrance Allergens)
  • EU Endocrine Disrupters – Ranked Priority List - Human Health Categorizations 1 and 2
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XIV - Substances Subject to Authorization
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XV - Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for Authorisation
  • Report on Carcinogens – Known to be Human Carcinogens and Reasonably Anticipated to be Human Carcinogens

European Union

U.S. State of California

  • ECHA Investigation Report: Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers
  • ECHA Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity Assessment List
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications – Carcinogenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Germ Cell Mutagenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Reproductive Toxicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex II - Prohibited Substances
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex III - Other Limitations and Requirements (Fragrance Allergens)
  • EU Endocrine Disrupters – Ranked Priority List - Human Health Categorizations 1 and 2
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XIV - Substances Subject to Authorization
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XV - Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for Authorisation
  • Proposition 65 – Carcinogens/Developmental/Reproductive Toxicants
  • Safer Consumer Products - Informational List of Candidate Chemicals and Chemical Groups

European Union

U.S. State of Maine

  • ECHA Investigation Report: Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers
  • ECHA Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity Assessment List
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications – Carcinogenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Germ Cell Mutagenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Reproductive Toxicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex II - Prohibited Substances
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex III - Other Limitations and Requirements (Fragrance Allergens)
  • EU Endocrine Disrupters – Ranked Priority List - Human Health Categorizations 1 and 2
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XIV - Substances Subject to Authorization
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XV - Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for Authorisation
  • Chemicals of High Concern
  • Priority Chemicals

European Union

U.S. State of Minnesota

  • ECHA Investigation Report: Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers
  • ECHA Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity Assessment List
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications – Carcinogenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Germ Cell Mutagenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Reproductive Toxicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex II - Prohibited Substances
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex III - Other Limitations and Requirements (Fragrance Allergens)
  • EU Endocrine Disrupters – Ranked Priority List - Human Health Categorizations 1 and 2
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XIV - Substances Subject to Authorization
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XV - Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for Authorisation
  • Priority Chemicals

European Union

U.S. State of Washington

  • ECHA Investigation Report: Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde Releasers
  • ECHA Persistence, Bioaccumulation and Toxicity Assessment List
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications – Carcinogenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Germ Cell Mutagenicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - CLP (1272/2008) - Annex VI - Table 3.1 - Classifications - Reproductive Toxicity (Categories 1A and 1B)
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex II - Prohibited Substances
  • EU - Cosmetics (1223/2009) - Annex III - Other Limitations and Requirements (Fragrance Allergens)
  • EU Endocrine Disrupters – Ranked Priority List - Human Health Categorizations 1 and 2
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XIV - Substances Subject to Authorization
  • EU - REACH (1907/2006) - Annex XV - Candidate List of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) for Authorisation
  • Chemicals of High Concern to Children (CHCC)
  • Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxins

Walmart relies on authoritative hazard identification and regulatory lists to identify Priority Chemicals for reduction, restriction, or elimination in accordance with Walmart's Commitment to Sustainable Chemistry in Formulated Consumables. We work with credible third-party organizations and leverage regulatory and authoritative resources to guide our approach.

The following criteria are used when evaluating whether to adopt a Reference List to help define the universe of Priority Chemicals:

  • The listing entity must be authoritative, meaning it is authorized to identify chemical hazards by state, national or international law and operates with publicly-disclosed listing criteria and procedures.
  • The list must address hazard or exposure traits that potentially pose serious effects to human health or the environment. A priority chemical is a chemical that meets the criteria for classification as a carcinogen, mutagen, reproductive toxicant, or is persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic; or any chemical for which there is scientific evidence of probable serious effects to human health or the environment which give rise to an equivalent level of concern.
  • The list must be publicly available from the listing entity.


Note: Chemicals on a Reference List may be excluded from the PC universe if any of the following criteria are met:

  • The chemical is listed subject to conditions identified by the listing entity. If these conditions are not met in the context of the product categories included in Consumables, the chemical may be excluded from the PC universe.

Walmart relies on the UL ChemAdvisor LOLI Chemical Registry Database to track the Reference Lists of Priority Chemicals. UL PurView distributes current versions of the Priority Chemical list to suppliers.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of safer ingredient databases, alternative assessments, and alternative assessment tools, methodologies and consulting services that suppliers may use to advance the safer formulation of products using informed substitutions.


Safer Alternative Ingredient Databases


Database & URL

Description

Product Category Focus

(# ingredients profiled)

Filters Available

Quality of Alternatives Assessment

EPA Safer Chemicals Ingredient List

Database of chemical ingredients, arranged by functional-use class, that the EPA Safer Choice Program has evaluated and determined to be safer than traditional chemical ingredients.

Cleaning Products

Personal Care Products

Lubricants & Adhesives

(430)

Technical function

Ingredients classified into full and half Green Circle, Yellow Triangle, Grey square

High - Third-party profilers (e.g., NSF or ToxServices) gathers hazard information and submits a report to Safer Choice, with a recommendation on whether the chemical passes the Criteria for Safer Chemical Ingredients.

CleanGredients

Database of market-ready ingredients pre-approved to meet EPA’s Safer Choice Standard

Cleaning Products

Technical function

High – Relies on EPA Safer Chemical Ingredients List

Consumer Products Ingredient Directory

Resource for ingredient nomenclature, regulatory status, and functions.

Cleaning Products

Technical function

High – Relies on EPA Safer Chemical Ingredients List

Pharos Chemicals and Material Library

Provides hazard, use, and exposure information on 177,184 chemicals and 214 different kinds of building products

Building & Construction (175,000)

Technical function

Compound groups

Medium – Includes results of certified Green Screen assessments

ChemFORWARD Chemical Hazard Data Trust

Subscription-based chemical hazard screening platform that profiles ingredient hazards and safer substitutes

Beauty & Personal Care, Electronics, Packaging, Plastics, Plastic Additives

Manufacturer, Sector, Technical function

Medium – Chemical hazard assessments are performed by independent assessors who meet and maintain ChemFORWARDqualification requirements

ChemSec Marketplace

Global ingredient marketplace database with safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals

Building & Construction (682)

Textiles (130)

Personal care & Cosmetics (55)

Food Contact Materials (51) Household chemicals (35)

Electronics (20)


Sector of use

Technical function

Evaluated alternatives-alternatives-requests

Standards or certifications


Low – Suppliers post ingredient profiles and are responsible for their claims, which are not validated by ChemSec

UL Prospector

Global ingredient marketplace database with some supplier-provided safer alternatives attributes or claims 

Adhesives & Sealants (8,000)

Food Beverage & Nutrition (30,500)

Graphic Arts (1,500)

Household Cleaners (2720)

Lubricants & Metalworking (1,290)

Paint & Coatings (835)

Personal Care & Cosmetics (10,000+)

Plastics (100,000+)

Metals (11,100)

Technical function

Chemical class

Formulation types

Low – no tags identify safer alternatives

Database & URL

EPA Safer Chemicals Ingredient List

Description

Database of chemical ingredients, arranged by functional-use class, that the EPA Safer Choice Program has evaluated and determined to be safer than traditional chemical ingredients.

Product Category Focus

(# ingredients profiled)

Cleaning Products

Personal Care Products

Lubricants & Adhesives

(430)

Filters Available

Technical function

Ingredients classified into full and half Green Circle, Yellow Triangle, Grey square

Quality of Alternatives Assessment

High - Third-party profilers (e.g., NSF or ToxServices) gathers hazard information and submits a report to Safer Choice, with a recommendation on whether the chemical passes the Criteria for Safer Chemical Ingredients.


Database & URL

CleanGredients

Description

Database of market-ready ingredients pre-approved to meet EPA’s Safer Choice Standard

Product Category Focus

(# ingredients profiled)

Cleaning Products

Filters Available

Technical function

Quality of Alternatives Assessment

High – Relies on EPA Safer Chemical Ingredients List


Database & URL

Consumer Products Ingredient Directory

Description

Resource for ingredient nomenclature, regulatory status, and functions.

Product Category Focus

(# ingredients profiled)

Cleaning Products

Filters Available

Technical function

Quality of Alternatives Assessment

High – Relies on EPA Safer Chemical Ingredients List


Database & URL

Pharos Chemicals and Material Library

Description

Provides hazard, use, and exposure information on 177,184 chemicals and 214 different kinds of building products

Product Category Focus

(# ingredients profiled)

Building & Construction (175,000)

Filters Available

Technical function

Compound groups

Quality of Alternatives Assessment

Medium – Includes results of certified Green Screen assessments


Database & URL

ChemFORWARD Chemical Hazard Data Trust

Description

Subscription-based chemical hazard screening platform that profiles ingredient hazards and safer substitutes

Product Category Focus

(# ingredients profiled)

Beauty & Personal Care, Electronics, Packaging, Plastics, Plastic Additives

Filters Available

Manufacturer, Sector, Technical function

Quality of Alternatives Assessment

Medium – Chemical hazard assessments are performed by independent assessors who meet and maintain ChemFORWARDqualification requirements


Database & URL

ChemSec Marketplace

Description

Global ingredient marketplace database with safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals

Product Category Focus

(# ingredients profiled)

Building & Construction (682)

Textiles (130)

Personal care & Cosmetics (55)

Food Contact Materials (51) Household chemicals (35)

Electronics (20)


Filters Available

Sector of use

Technical function

Evaluated alternatives-alternatives-requests

Standards or certifications


Quality of Alternatives Assessment

Low – Suppliers post ingredient profiles and are responsible for their claims, which are not validated by ChemSec


Database & URL

UL Prospector

Description

Global ingredient marketplace database with some supplier-provided safer alternatives attributes or claims 

Product Category Focus

(# ingredients profiled)

Adhesives & Sealants (8,000)

Food Beverage & Nutrition (30,500)

Graphic Arts (1,500)

Household Cleaners (2720)

Lubricants & Metalworking (1,290)

Paint & Coatings (835)

Personal Care & Cosmetics (10,000+)

Plastics (100,000+)

Metals (11,100)

Filters Available

Technical function

Chemical class

Formulation types

Quality of Alternatives Assessment

Low – no tags identify safer alternatives



Collections of Alternatives Assessments for Specific Product - Chemical Use Cases


Database & URL

Description

Product Category Focus (# ingredients profiled)

Filters Available

Quality of Alternatives Assessment

EPA DfE Alternatives Assessments

Publishes results of specific alternatives assessment partnership projects that the Design for the Environment program has conducted in support of TSCA programs

Cleaning Products

Articles treated with flame retardants

Thermal paper products

Alternatives to Nonylphenol Ethoxylates,

Flame Retardants Used in Flexible Polyurethane Foam/in Printed Circuit Boards,

Flame Retardant Alternatives to DecaBDE/HBCD, Bisphenol A in Thermal Paper

High – Results from multi-stakeholder process following DfE Alternatives Assessment Criteria for Hazard Evaluation

Toxics Use Reduction Institute, UMass Lowell

List of research reports driven by the needs of Massachusetts industry for safer alternatives

Multiple

TURI Safer Alternatives to Halogenated Solvents Used in Surface Cleaning Applications

High

Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse Alternatives Assessment Library and Chemical Hazard Assessment Database

List of publicly available alternatives assessments with case studies. Database enables users to search for GreenScreen® and Quick Chemical Assessment Tool assessments

Multiple


Medium – Quality varies by source of assessment

Database & URL

EPA DfE Alternatives Assessments

Description

Publishes results of specific alternatives assessment partnership projects that the Design for the Environment program has conducted in support of TSCA programs

Product Category Focus (# ingredients profiled)

Cleaning Products

Articles treated with flame retardants

Thermal paper products

Filters Available

Alternatives to Nonylphenol Ethoxylates,

Flame Retardants Used in Flexible Polyurethane Foam/in Printed Circuit Boards,

Flame Retardant Alternatives to DecaBDE/HBCD, Bisphenol A in Thermal Paper

Quality of Alternatives Assessment

High – Results from multi-stakeholder process following DfE Alternatives Assessment Criteria for Hazard Evaluation


Database & URL

Toxics Use Reduction Institute, UMass Lowell

Description

List of research reports driven by the needs of Massachusetts industry for safer alternatives

Product Category Focus (# ingredients profiled)

Multiple

Filters Available

TURI Safer Alternatives to Halogenated Solvents Used in Surface Cleaning Applications

Quality of Alternatives Assessment

High


Database & URL

Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse Alternatives Assessment Library and Chemical Hazard Assessment Database

Description

List of publicly available alternatives assessments with case studies. Database enables users to search for GreenScreen® and Quick Chemical Assessment Tool assessments

Product Category Focus (# ingredients profiled)

Multiple

Filters Available


Quality of Alternatives Assessment

Medium – Quality varies by source of assessment



Alternatives Assessment Tools, Methodologies & Consulting Services


Methodology/Service

Offering

Level of Domain Expertise Required for Use

GreenScreen List Translator

Rapid screening assessment tool for chemical substances. The screening evaluation results in three outcomes: of high concern, possibly of high concern, and unknown. GSLT is meant to prioritize chemicals for a more comprehensive assessment using the full GreenScreen® method

Medium

GreenScreen® for Safer Chemicals


Comprehensive chemical hazard assessment method developed by the nonprofit group Clean Production Action. Publicly available GS assessments are listed on the GreenScreen Assessment Registry

High – Assessments are conducted by Licensed GreenScreen Profilers.

Scivera Lens Chemical Safety Assessment System

Provides automated restricted substance list (RSL) review, hazard evaluation, exposure assessment (human health and environmental) and risk assessment over the life cycle of the product. User can process potential substitutes through the RSL, hazard, exposure, and risk steps to identify preferred alternatives.

High - Assessments are conducted by Scivera toxicologists and support a variety of sector (e.g., ZDHC, EPEAT, LHAMA) or supplier (e.g., Nike, Intel, Costco) green chemistry standards.

TURI Tools and Methods

List of tools and methods for conducting alternatives assessment

Very High

OECD Substitution and Alternatives Assessment Toolbox

Lists substitution and alternatives assessment tools and data sources

Very High

NRC Framework to Guide Selection of Chemical Alternatives

National Academy of Science developed A Framework to Guide Selection of Chemical Alternatives to help interested parties find safer chemical substitutes

Medium

BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol


Decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives. It describes a process for identifying alternatives to a chemical of concern, screening out equally hazardous alternatives, and selecting an alternative that is technically and economically viable and does not have the potential for causing significant environmental or human health impacts

Medium

Alternatives Assessment Frameworks: Research Needs for the Informed Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals

Academic analysis of alternatives assessment frameworks: identifies consistencies and differences in methods and outlines needs for research and collaboration to advance science policy practice

Medium

Methodology/Service

GreenScreen List Translator

Offering

Rapid screening assessment tool for chemical substances. The screening evaluation results in three outcomes: of high concern, possibly of high concern, and unknown. GSLT is meant to prioritize chemicals for a more comprehensive assessment using the full GreenScreen® method

Level of Domain Expertise Required for Use

Medium


Methodology/Service

GreenScreen® for Safer Chemicals


Offering

Comprehensive chemical hazard assessment method developed by the nonprofit group Clean Production Action. Publicly available GS assessments are listed on the GreenScreen Assessment Registry

Level of Domain Expertise Required for Use

High – Assessments are conducted by Licensed GreenScreen Profilers.


Methodology/Service

Scivera Lens Chemical Safety Assessment System

Offering

Provides automated restricted substance list (RSL) review, hazard evaluation, exposure assessment (human health and environmental) and risk assessment over the life cycle of the product. User can process potential substitutes through the RSL, hazard, exposure, and risk steps to identify preferred alternatives.

Level of Domain Expertise Required for Use

High - Assessments are conducted by Scivera toxicologists and support a variety of sector (e.g., ZDHC, EPEAT, LHAMA) or supplier (e.g., Nike, Intel, Costco) green chemistry standards.


Methodology/Service

TURI Tools and Methods

Offering

List of tools and methods for conducting alternatives assessment

Level of Domain Expertise Required for Use

Very High


Methodology/Service

OECD Substitution and Alternatives Assessment Toolbox

Offering

Lists substitution and alternatives assessment tools and data sources

Level of Domain Expertise Required for Use

Very High


Methodology/Service

NRC Framework to Guide Selection of Chemical Alternatives

Offering

National Academy of Science developed A Framework to Guide Selection of Chemical Alternatives to help interested parties find safer chemical substitutes

Level of Domain Expertise Required for Use

Medium


Methodology/Service

BizNGO Chemical Alternatives Assessment Protocol


Offering

Decision framework for substituting chemicals of concern to human health or the environment with safer alternatives. It describes a process for identifying alternatives to a chemical of concern, screening out equally hazardous alternatives, and selecting an alternative that is technically and economically viable and does not have the potential for causing significant environmental or human health impacts

Level of Domain Expertise Required for Use

Medium


Methodology/Service

Alternatives Assessment Frameworks: Research Needs for the Informed Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals

Offering

Academic analysis of alternatives assessment frameworks: identifies consistencies and differences in methods and outlines needs for research and collaboration to advance science policy practice

Level of Domain Expertise Required for Use

Medium


#f2f2f2